Math
−1.9 pts27.2%
741 tested
- vs. district
- −6.0 pts
- vs. Georgia
- −18.0 pts
Georgia Milestones · 2025–26
Lewis Frasier Middle School
Proficient or Distinguished, all EOG subjects
29.0%−0.9 pts vs. 2024–25
Tests reported
1,254
What stands out
Findings for 2025–26
Generated directly from the published results — every statement below can be checked against the tables on this page.
Algebra: C&C gained 4.7 points
92.3% of students scored Proficient or Distinguished in 2025–26, up from 87.6% in 2024–25.
The Students with Disabilities gap in Social Studies narrowed by 14.6 points
Students with Disabilities sat 36.9 points behind Students without Disabilities in 2024–25, and 22.3 points behind them in 2025–26.
Algebra: C&C is 44.2 points above the state
Lewis Frasier Middle School reported 92.3% Proficient or Distinguished in 2025–26; Georgia reported 48.1%.
Algebra: C&C is 63.1 points above the Liberty County average
92.3% here vs. 29.2% Proficient or Distinguished in 2025–26.
Science lost 3.8 points
20.0% of students scored Proficient or Distinguished in 2025–26, down from 23.8% in 2024–25.
The Students with Disabilities gap in Science narrowed by 4.4 points
Students with Disabilities sat 24.6 points behind Students without Disabilities in 2024–25, and 20.2 points behind them in 2025–26.
End of grade
Performance by subject
Percent of students scoring Proficient or Distinguished, with the change from last year and the distance to the district and state averages.
Science
−3.8 pts20.0%
230 tested
- vs. district
- −8.7 pts
- vs. Georgia
- −18.2 pts
Social Studies
−1.0 pts36.3%
256 tested
- vs. district
- +5.4 pts
- vs. Georgia
- −3.9 pts
Physical Sci.
+38.6 pts85.2%
27 tested
- vs. district
- −4.4 pts
- vs. Georgia
- +24.3 pts
BeginningDevelopingProficientDistinguished
Year over year
Against the district and the state
Solid line is Lewis Frasier Middle School. Dashed lines are Liberty County and Georgia.
Math
Science
Social Studies
Physical Sci.
By grade
Where performance sits across grades
Percent Proficient or Distinguished in each tested grade, with the change from last year. Darker cells are stronger.
| Grade | Math |
|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 25% −1.3 |
| Grade 7 | 26% −0.8 |
| Grade 8 | 31% −4.7 |
Science is tested only in grade 8:20%−3.8Social Studies is tested only in grade 8:36%−1.0Physical Science is tested only in grade 8:85%+38.625%31%
Student groups
Gaps between student groups
Percent Proficient or Distinguished for each reported group, and how far each sits from the school as a whole.
Students with Disabilities
Points behind Students without Disabilities
- Math26.5 ptsnarrowed 2.7
- Science20.2 ptsnarrowed 4.4
- Social Studies22.3 ptsnarrowed 14.6
| Student group | % of Tested | Math | Science | Social Studies | Physical Sci. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | n=741 | 27.2% | 20.0% | 36.3% | 85.2% |
| Gender | |||||
| Female | 47.1% | 29.2%+2.0 | 20.2%+0.2 | 35.7%−0.6 | 80.0%−5.2 |
| Male | 52.9% | 25.4%−1.8 | 19.8%−0.2 | 37.0%+0.7 | — |
| Race / Ethnicity | |||||
| Black or African American | 57.0% | 23.0%−4.2 | 17.6%−2.4 | 37.6%+1.3 | — |
| Hispanic | 15.9% | 29.7%+2.5 | 22.2%+2.2 | 26.2%−10.1 | — |
| Two or More Races | 10.1% | 36.1%+8.9 | 23.8%+3.8 | 29.2%−7.1 | — |
| White | 14.6% | 35.2%+8.0 | 24.1%+4.1 | 51.5%+15.2 | — |
| Student Groups | |||||
| Students with Disabilities | 14.7% | 4.6%−22.6 | 2.9%−17.1 | 17.1%−19.2 | — |
| Students without Disabilities | 85.3% | 31.1%+3.9 | 23.1%+3.1 | 39.4%+3.1 | 85.2%+0.0 |
| Not Limited English Proficient | 96.0% | 28.1%+0.9 | 21.3%+1.3 | 38.0%+1.7 | 85.2%+0.0 |
| Non-Migrant | 100.0% | 27.2%+0.0 | 20.0%+0.0 | 36.3%+0.0 | 85.2%+0.0 |
End of course
High school course results
Georgia Milestones End-of-Course assessments taken at this school.
| Course | Tested | Proficient+ | vs. Georgia | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Algebra: Concepts and Connections | 26 | 92.3% +4.7 | +44.2 |
Source: Georgia Milestones school aggregates published by the Governor's Office of Student Achievement. “Proficient or Distinguished” combines the top two of Georgia's four achievement levels. Cells marked “—” were withheld by the state because the group was too small to report without identifying individual students. School-level groups are small by nature, so figures move more from year to year than a district's do — read them alongside the district trend rather than on their own. Back to Liberty County.